Deconstructing "Deconstructing Wikipedia"
Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia. At least not originally. When the move was made to sacrifice authorship for increased breadth and depth it became a different entity. A freak. No longer academic, but wholly educational.
Opening up the site allowed Wiki to balloon into the largest information source ever created. After running through a Wild West stage of anarchy, the keepers of the Wiki decided to crack down on authority. Retroactively re-establishing the site as a semi-credible source. It is not intended, though, for singular view. Merely tidbits and directions of pieces of information which will require further research and authentication. Most of the time.
![]() |
| According to his Wiki, GW was a real party animal. And loved John Waters movies, Battlebots, and Faygo. |
The claims of what Wiki is and isn't seem to be "covering the bases" kind of talk. It says, "hey we're an encyclopedia. Except when we fuck up these things that constitute a reputable encyclopedia. Then we're not trying to be that. We're just like that." I understand that the foundation and inception of Wikipedia make it a difficult climb to reputable status, but don't make so many excuses.
All that said I can't be mad as Wikipedia. What else would I do when I am bored?

